CHAPTER FIVE: 9/11--Some Parting Shots



At this point, I would imagine there are other questions about the 9/11 attacks that may be in the mind of the reader:
Wouldn't someone have noticed all the ongoing preparations for a controlled demolition?

On the day of the attacks, did anyone notice any unusual activities...any unsual occurrences that might indicate this was something other than what has been described in the mainstream media and the official government?

There is, in fact, dramatic testimony coming from a large number of witnesses who were at the World Trade Center that which they report having seen and heard things which indicated a controlled demolition. What follows is a sampling of these comments (from the 911Proof website).

This first one is the transcript from a tape of two firefighters being interviewed back at their firehouse:

Firefighter One: "It was as if it was detonated. Like if they had a plan to take down the building. Boom, boom, boom,boom, boom."
Firefighter Two: "Yeah, detonated."

Craig Bartmer, NYPD officer: "I myself ran from Building 7 as it fell. I heard with my own ears what sounded like a rapid succession of explosions, while running."

Richard Banaciski, NYFD, Ladder 22: "We were there, I don't know, maybe 10, 15 minutes and then I just remember there was just an explosion. It seemed like on television when they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions. Everybody just said run and we all turned around and we ran..."

Firefighter Edward Cachia: "It actually gave at a lower floor, not the floor where the plane hit. We originally thought there was like an internal detonation, explosives..."

Witness Timothy Burke: "The building popped, lower than the fire...I was going 'oh my gosh', there is a secondary device because the way the building popped. I thought it was an explosion."

Firefighter Thomas Turilli: " almost sounded like bombs going off, like boom, boom, boom, like seven or eight..."

Daniel Rivera, paramedic, Battalion 31, Station 36: " first I thought it was -- do you ever see professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear pop pop pop pop pop -- thats exactly what I thought it was."

Deputy Commissioner Thomas Fitzpatrick: My initial reaction was that this was exactly the way it looks when they show you those implosions on TV.

Firefighter Kenneth Rogers: "There was an explosion in the South Tower...I kept watching. Floor after floor after floor. It looked like a synchronized deliberate kind of thing."

Teresa Veliz, facilities manager for a software company (she was on the 47th floor of the North Tower when the plane hit): "There were explosions going off everywhere. I was convinced that there were bombs planted all over the place and someone was sitting at a control panel pushing detonator buttons."

Paul Isaac, NYFD firefighter and a First Responder: "Many fireman know there were bombs in the building but they are afraid for their jobs to admit it because the higher-ups forbid discussion of this fact..."

Now, click over to Google Video and watch this short clip (52 seconds) entitled “WTC 7 about to blow up” which firefighters and other emergency personnel seem to have been literally told that the building (WTC7, in this case) was going to be "blown up". Here are a few of the quotes you hear from this video:

"Keep your eye on that building. That thing's coming down."

"The whole thing is about to blow up. Move back."

"We are walking back. The whole building is about to blow up."

Add to that, the testimony of a number of "First Responder" whistleblowers who have come forward to describe their experiences that day. The picture gets pretty grim:

1) "An anonymous EMT named Mike [reported] that hundreds of emergency rescue personnel were told over bullhorns that Building 7, a 47 story skyscraper adjacent the twin towers that was not hit by a plane yet imploded symmetrically later in the afternoon on 9/11, was about to be "pulled" and that a 20 second radio countdown preceded its collapse."

"[This same EMT] described how he has repeatedly tried to alert numerous authorities to what he saw on 9/11 but was ignored or told to "shut up" on every occasion, and ultimately fired for disorderly conduct."

2) On September 9 2006, Former Air Force Special Operations for Search and Rescue, Kevin McPadden told an audience at the Community Church in New York City how while he was stationed in a Red Cross operations center, he was told that Building 7 was going to be brought down.

McPADDEN: "They said you know you've got to stay behind this line because they're thinking about taking this building down, they're not sure if it's stable or not, so they were holding a line off because they had knowledge that something was gonna happen. Well, they pushed us back a little bit....a couple of minutes later they started coming down....people started coming back out to the street..."

“We started asking questions, everybody started asking questions, and the next thing you know there was a Red Cross representative pacing back and forth in front of the crowd holding his hand over the radio - I couldn’t hear what it was saying but it was like pulsed - whatever the speech was on there it was pulsed - and that means to me most likely it was a countdown.”

“But he took his hand off at the last three seconds and he gave this heartfelt look - like just run for your life - because he didn’t want to bring it on his conscience - he didn’t want to go to his grave with that - and then we had a couple of seconds to put our heads together.”

McPadden then describes the scene as a "stampede" as people ran over each other in their attempts to flee. McPadden made it clear that he and onlookers clearly heard “three, two, one” from the radio before the building collapsed.

Here is a brief (3 minute) interview with McPadden.

3) Indira Singh was a volunteer civilian Emergency Medical Technician at the World Trade Center on September 11th. She was a Senior Consultant for JP Morgan Chase in Information Technology and Risk Management. Singh was responsible for setting up triage sites for the seriously injured and walking wounded. These sites were closed down and consolidated one by one as the day wore on. Appearing on the Pacifica show Guns and Butter, Singh describes her experience to host Bonnie Faulkner:

SINGH: "After midday on 9/11 we had to evacuate that because they told us Building 7 was coming down. If you had been there, not being able to see very much just flames everywhere and smoke - it is entirely possible - I do believe that they brought Building 7 down because I heard that they were going to bring it down because it was unstable because of the collateral damage. That I don't know I can't attest to the validity of that all I can attest to is that by noon or one o'clock they told us we need to move from that triage site up to Pace University a little further away because Building 7 was going to come down or be brought down."

HOST: "Did they actually use the word "brought down" and who was it that was telling you this?"

SINGH: "The fire department. And they did use the words 'we're gonna have to bring it down' and for us there observing the nature of the devastation it made total sense to us that this was indeed a possibility, given the subsequent controversy over it I don't know."
Google Video


Any number of eyewitnesses report seeing flashes (and hearing explosions) coming from inside the buildings seconds before the collapses and even during the collapse process. Here is some testimony which was part of the 9/11 Commission investigation...but which was never made part of the final report:

Assistant Fire Commissioner Gregory of the NYFD: ".....before No. 2 came down...I saw low-level flashes. In my conversation with Lieutenant Evangelista, never mentioning this to him, he questioned me and asked me if I saw low-level flashes in front of the building, and I agreed with him because I thought -- at that time I didn't know what it was."

"I mean, it could have been as a result of the building collapsing, things exploding, but I saw a flash flash flash and then it looked like the building came down...You know like when they demolish a building, how when they blow up a building, when it falls down? That's what I thought I saw."

"And I didn't broach the topic to him, but he asked me. He said I don't know if I'm crazy, but I just wanted to ask you because you were standing right next to me. He said did you see anything by the building? And I said what do you mean by see anything? He said did you see any flashes? I said, yes, well, I thought it was just me. He said no, I saw them, too."

These two men both believed they might be observing a controlled demolition. You can see how they were obviously struggling to wrap their minds around something that would have monstrous implications.


Here are some extraordinary video clips which show these flashes occurring. This first video is showing massive numbers of flashes. This one is only 42 seconds long. From :17 thru :27 the North Tower lights up like a Christmas tree. You may have to watch this clip two or three times before you figure out where exactly to focus. When you do, you see unbelievably huge and widespread flashing actions.

Here is another Google Video--view this one starting at the 1 min. 31 sec. mark (1:31). This is probably the clearest one of the three I am providing here.

Then watch this about 48 seconds in and all the way to the end at 1:05-- You will, again, see hundreds of flashes coming from below the descending dust cloud and from within the dust cloud.

And by the way, go back and watch this particular video to specifically observe the blatantly obvious "squibs" shooting out all over the place. (Again, this is best viewed in the later "extra-slow motion" portion of this short video--from about the 48 sec. mark.)

‘Squib’ is a term used by professional demolitionists to refer to the telltale dynamic emergence of explosive ejecta that result from ‘placed explosives’. You can plainly observe these ‘squibs’ sticking out all over the building during moments in this video clip.

Here is a good still photo from Morgan Reynolds' website, which plainly shows one of these demolition squibs in action.

For comparison, here is a short video clip (1 minute 23 seconds) showing another controlled demolition of a high rise building. Please notice the identical 'flashes' coming from inside the building (at :36), as you saw with these WTC collapses.


When it comes to this question of just exactly how the perpetrators may have gone about placing these explosives in the buildings without detection...we need to be careful to 'keep our eye on the ball' so to speak. In other words, I have seen people trying to argue (essentially) that if we can't produce a detailed exposé on how this may have been accomplished, this then becomes proof (in their minds) that it wasn't accomplished...that there was no controlled demolition of these buildings.

Hold the phone--If we were to find a tree chopped down in a forest, wouldn't it be unreasonable to claim: "Well, I don't see how anyone could have crept into the forest and chopped this down without anyone I'm not going to believe it was chopped down"? If the evidence indicates a tree was chopped down, then that is the reality whether you understand how exactly it was accomplished, or not.

Having said that--while we're waiting for the discovery of videotaped footage of bad guys carrying explosives into these buildings...there is, in the meantime, very disturbing evidence spilling out from every direction:

Were you aware that an ‘elevator company’ had been ‘working’ on the elevators and elevator shafts for nine months, apparently right up to the very day of the collapse? They had supposedly been ‘modernizing’ and ‘retrofitting’ the mechanisms. During those nine months, they had total access to the entire inner core of the buildings.

Interestingly, only a few years before, this company (A.C.E. Elevator) had taken over the management of the elevators from the original company (Otis Elevator) that had first installed them. As far as can be determined, this mysterious outfit had virtually no other service contracts before, during or after 9/11. After the destruction of WTC, ACE Elevator lingered inexplicably up until 2004, when it finally declared bankruptcy.

Additionally, it was noted by a number of observers that the behavior of ACE personnel on the day of the attacks...was suspicious.

After the towers had been hit by the airplanes, hundreds of gung-ho firefighters and police officers continued to pour into the buildings in attempts to rescue survivors. Obviously, from their behavior and from subsequent testimonies, none of these people had any inkling that the buildings could actually undergo a demolition-style collapse.

But these ACE people disappeared. It was noted by many firefighters and others on the scene...that this is utterly anomalous and disturbing behavior. In these situations, the elevator engineers normally play a very important role in helping rescue personnel sort out all the elevator issues...which ones are in working condition, which ones can be jury-rigged back into working condition...which ones are dangerous...etc. They are to play a central role. But A.C.E. personnel all left the scene--extremely odd behavior.

Ironically (and tellingly), a number of off-duty Otis Elevator personnel lost their lives as they had spontaneously rushed to the scene and gone into the buildings to aid in the rescue, before the first collapse.


Other possibilities which have been pointed out: Consider the internal mailing and delivery system of these buildings, for a moment. How many thousands of packages and parcels were delivered inside these buildings on a daily basis? And if there were ongoing elevator "repairs", might it have been possible to disguise explosives or other deadly items as packaged or boxed "business equipment" or "elevator parts" and other such things?

If the American and British POWs were able to build an entire network of underground tunnels and pull off the so-called "Great Escape" during WW2 on nothing but the proverbial much more so could someone create ingenious methods for inserting these explosives into the WTC buildings, with unlimited outside resources and years of planning?


What if the "explosives" were actually in spray-on or liquid form...and disguised as paint? The fact is that in the last few years, scientists and other experts in the "9/11 truther" movement have been coming forward with research evidence regarding nanothermite having been found at the collapse sites...and of the US government's very deep involvement in nanothermite technology.

A number of concerned NYC residents voluntarily submitted samples of the dust from the collapsed buildings (dust which settled on the ground all over Manhattan) 9/11 truther-researchers...such as physicist Dr. Steven Jones. The startling fact emerged matter where these samples were collected from around the area, they all contained microscopic bits of unexploded nanothermite!

Unexploded nanothermite chips--found in the debris dust all over Manhattan

Debunkers have (deliberately?) confused run-of-the-mill thermite with high-tech nanothermite (a whole 'nother 'ballgame!) and have tried to forward the completely off-point argument that..."thermite" is merely a "burning agent" with no explosive capability.

They are flatly contradicted by the plain evidence--inadvertently supportive testimony from the nation's top nanothermite experts: The folks of Lawrence Livermore Laboratories in Livermore, CA...the very ones who have developed this stuff. These statements were made in 1999, before 9/11:

"The high surface area of the reactants within energetic sol-gels allows for the far higher rate of energy release than is seen in “macro” thermite mixtures, making nano-thermites “high explosives” as well as pyrotechnic materials"

This comes from scientists Gash AE, Simpson RL, Tillotson TM, Satcher JH, Hrubesh LW of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in 1999. The quotes can be found at this LINK

But get a load of these further statements from Lawrence Livermore:

“The sol-gel process is very amenable to dip-, spin-, and spray-coating technologies to coat surfaces. We have utilized this property to dip-coat various substrates to make sol-gel Fe,O,/ Al / Viton coatings. The energetic coating dries to give a nice adherent film. Preliminary experiments indicate that films of the hybrid material are self-propagating when ignited by thermal stimulus” (LLNL scientists Gash, Tillitson et al 2002).

Were the ACE elevator workers (and/or other WTC maintenance workers) unknowingly (or knowingly?) "painting" this nanothermite onto the interior structures?


Researcher Kevin Ryan has compiled very revealing evidence which points out a number of NIST leaders who have feigned ignorance regarding any possible role nanothermite may have played in the destruction of the WTC buildings...while the truth of the matter is that they themselves have been major players in nanothermite technology.

To me, that is a huge indication of murderous, psychopathic corruption. I strongly encourage any concerned citizen to read through this heavily documented article from Kevin Ryan:

The Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites


Here is some more circumstantial evidence....and for the first time in this report, we are mentioning actual names of possible suspects in a "9/11 inside job" scenario. And with that, there may be some toes being stepped on here goes:

Is it a mere coincidence that Marvin Bush, brother of the current President, was a "director" for Securacom up until the very day of 9/11?

Realize this: Securacom was responsible for WTC security top to bottom in the years leading up to 9/11. I would ask the question: Were there wolves guarding the hen house here? Also, Wirt D. Walker, a cousin of George Walker Bush...was CEO of Securacom.

During their tenure, they reportedly added miles of new wiring to the buildings over a period of years (1996-2000). It was described as a "new security system".

Whatever the significance of this may be, we once again have the usual suspicious behavior from the 9/11 Commission: Absolutely no mention of Bush relatives in these sensitive security positions. In fact, pressure was apparently brought to keeping Marvin Bush and Wirt Walker out of the scope of investigation.


There is the added fact that during the weekend prior to 9/11 (which was a Tuesday) there was an unprecedented "power down" of the South Tower. This was reported by, among others, Scott Forbes--an IT specialist working at the WTC.

VIDEO: Scott Forbes--THE 9/11 power down (4 minutes)

Forbes quotes: "We were notified three weeks in advance...of the power down..."

"That was relatively short notice for plans to shut down all of our banking was a big was unprecedented..."

"During that weekend, because of the power down there was no security...the doors were all open [unless locked manually with a key]...and also, all the security cameras were all off..."

"There were guys in overalls carrying huge toolboxes...and with reels of cable...and they were all walking around the building that weekend...."

That's pretty spooky stuff, to say the very least. William Rodriguez and an array of other witnesses have said the same thing about this "power down"--it left the building literally wide open. Again, this is all happening two days before 9/11.

Scott Forbes was extremely suspicious when the buildings collapsed and made every effort to offer his testimony to authorities, including the 9/11 Commission. Of course, you may have already guessed what the 9/11 Commission did with Forbes' testimony....they summarily ignored the man.

Other folks...including Ben Fountain, an official for Fireman's Funds...have reported a series of "unusual evacuations" in the weeks leading up to 9/11. Also, the "security alert" was removed for the WTC five days before 9/11 and bomb-sniffing dogs were then also removed from the WTC. That is utterly suspicious.

LINK: "Stratesec installed the initial security-description plan—the layout of the electronic security system—at the World Trade Center."


In answer to the above question: First of all, the government has a long history of successfully keeping huge secrets. This business of continually scoffing at the idea that secrets could ever be kept...has been a huge 'false obstacle'. The government has all manner of secrets...and they're all being "kept".

Recall the Manhattan Project, as one example-- a very extensive undertaking to develop the Atomic bomb during WW2. Recall yet again, the Gulf of Tonkin false flag event: Even though, identically to the 9/11 scenario, there were 'whistleblowers from the very first moments, the US government in cooperation with a rigged mainstream media, kept the fact of a non-existent naval battle effectively under wraps for decades...until long after there would be any repercussions for any of the government criminals involved.

Recall once again the mind boggling evils which were proposed by top government officials (led by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs) in regard to Operation Northwoods: If such misconduct and dangerous psychopathy were properly reported and exposed by the media, many Americans would take to the streets in protest. But the story has been systematically obscured from the news reporting and from the pages of history books.

And secondly, the government's 9/11 treachery hasn't been kept a so far as there have been hundreds of whistleblowers, just like the whistleblowers from the Gulf of Tonkin. 

You can google "Sibel Edmonds", just for openers.

Edmonds interview

There were many people who spoke out even before 9/11--

FBI agent John O'Neill knew about the attacks beforehand...and appears to have been set up in a de facto assassination. LINK

FBI informant Randy Glass, working an undercover sting, was told by Pakistani intelligence operatives that the World Trade Center towers were coming down, and that airplanes would be used. His repeated warnings which continued until weeks before the attacks, were ignored by federal authorities. Additional LINK

David Schippers, on the basis of information provided by FBI agents about upcoming attacks in lower Manhattan, tried unsuccessfully to convey this information to Attorney General Ashcroft during the six weeks prior to 9/11. LINK

FBI agent, Kenneth Williams got wind of the attack and two months before 9/11 sent a word of warning to his superiors. He was brushed aside. Below is the memo, dated 7/10/2001.

Larger image at the SmokingGun website.

Additionally, FBI agent Coleen Rowley complained that officials did see the documents from agent Williams...and that further efforts to investigate were "sabotaged".

In late August, two weeks before the attack, Minnesota FBI agents working with Rowley became "absolutely convinced" there were plans to hijack an airplane...based on intelligence gathered from Zacarias Moussaoui.

At that point, agent Greg Jones told FBI headquarters that there was going to be an attempt to “fly something into the World Trade Center”.

The Minnesota agents became "desperate" to get into Moussaoui's confiscated laptop. But on August 21, the RFU (Radical Fundamentalist Unit) at FBI headquarters blocked (that's right--blocked) the application for a criminal warrant.

Using a different legal angle, the agents made one more application attempt on August 25, seventeen days before the attacks. They were blocked again. Quote from Rowley:

“Why would an FBI agent deliberately sabotage a case? The superiors acted so strangely that some agents in the Minneapolis office openly joked that these higher-ups ‘had to be spies or moles… working for Osama bin Laden.'"

It is interesting to see how the mainstream media 'spun' all of this: They essentially blew a lot of smoke in Rowley's direction. They loudly heralded her as one of Time magazine's "Persons of the Year"...with the apparent unspoken agreement that she tone down any of the talk of treasonous
"sabotage" and instead, play along with the "accidental incompetence" meme. The establishment even tossed her another 'bone' in the form of an endorsement for a run for a congressional seat. Her campaign didn't succeed.

I do not 'blame' someone like Rowley, out of hand. These whistleblowers have played it right to the edge. Someone in her position might quickly develop very serious health problems (if you know what I mean) if they pushed too hard in the 'wrong' direction.


Then there was the amazing saga of the military aide who approached Vice-President Cheney numerous times as the plane (or missile?) was tracking towards the Pentagon, who was rather incredulously inquiring whether a "stand down" (no shoot) order was still in place ("..the plane is ten miles out...does the order still stand?") and being testily rebuffed by Cheney.

Transportation Secretary Norm Mineta witnessed the exchange....and then testified to this bizarre "no shoot" order before the 9/11 Commission, only to have (you guessed it) his testimony blocked out of the report.

At the time of this exchange between the aide and Cheney, Mineta had had the initial impression that Cheney's "order" was to target the approaching airliner. After all, who could have conceived of anyone deliberately allowing this airplane to plow into the Pentagon?

But in the aftermath it became clear, no surface-to-air missiles were ever launched at any time even though the Pentagon (by numerous credible reports) is bristling with missile batteries. Mineta then began to realize the true nature of this aide's questions.

In this Google video, Mineta indicates he now realizes the aide was not asking about a "shoot down" order. Common sense would seem to indicate that the order therefore pertained to a 'stand down'...a stand down being tantamount to treasonous conspiracy. How would it not be?

The interviewer asks Mineta: "You actually thought it was a 'shoot down' order, when you learned later that was not the case." Mineta: "Yes."

There were also many VIPs who were told to stay off planes during the last few days before 9/11 (indicating foreknowledge). San Francisco mayor Willie Brown is one who reported being told the day before, about staying off planes. If there was this kind of foreknowledge, why wasn't the rest of the community given a 'heads up'?

Then there are all these other guys --
Delmart "Mike" Vreeland, Michael Riconosciuto, Uday Hussein, who wrote a letter to Putin a year before 9/11...on and on and on. You can google these individuals.

[As of 5/2/20, The Uday Hussein link has been 'killed'. But here you can see there were others who also saw this letter to Putin. In the years since I wrote these words, Google has become unbelievably creepy and sinister.]


From my understanding, the actual mechanics of keeping government secrets turns out to be a rather anticlimactically simple proposition after all: I have read testimonies over and many folks have kept their silence only out of a fear of losing retirement benefits, losing a job, and the possibility of criminal charges. In many instances, it's no more complicated than that.

Becoming a whistleblower against potential criminal behavior within the US government is a very tricky, very dicey proposition in reality: There really isn't such a thing as a "government witness protection program"...from the government.

LewRockwell article: Someone Would Have Talked?

As one example, in the days following the 9/11 attacks, six air traffic controllers were quite alarmed by the anomalies they witnessed which they believed indicated foul play within government ranks. So they sat down together and recorded a conversation among them onto a cassette tape.

A supervisor discovered the tape and smashed it to pieces, cutting up the actual tape ribbon, and throwing the various pieces into a number of different wastebaskets. These six air traffic controllers have never attempted to speak out again. They apparently "know" things...but obviously believe it would destroy their lives and careers to speak out.

Many have pressed forward with their testimonies despite having their careers ruined. Physicist Stephen Jones, FBI agent Sibel Edmonds, technical expert Kevin Ryan, Barry Jennings (deceased under "mysterious circumstances"), Danny Jowenko (again, deceased under "mysterious circumstances")...on and on.

When you're up against a virtual crime syndicate hidden within the ranks of government...all bets are off. This is the same way in which many Mafia capers in history past, involving hundreds of criminal participants, have achieved many years of successful airtight secrecy--the 'witnesses' fear for their lives.

And while we're on the subject, even if we want to postulate a Al-Qaida-did-it 9/11 many hundreds of those people would have needed to keep their silence...and over how many years? This notion--"they-could-never-keep-a-secret" doesn't add up. A group of perpetrators (whoever they are) obviously DID keep a secret during the months and years of planning which led up to 9/11.


There are other aspects to the 'mechanics' of government secrecy. Consider the "compartmentalization" technique: An operation like this would typically be conducted in covert military fashion, which involves extreme compartmentalization. At any given point, the left hand is prevented from knowing what the right hand is doing.

Consider also the element of indoctrination. This is, by the way, where the cultic element of satanic allegiance comes into possible play. But even apart from such exotic explanations...I believe many of us ordinary folk have simply not understood the subtle power of propaganda and indoctrination.

As I had mentioned before, indoctrination had millions of otherwise decent, compassionate Americans heartily supporting and cheering on the
holocaust of half a million Iraqi children during the Bill Clinton / Madeleine Albright Oil-for-Food mass murder, which occurred throughout the decade of the 90's.

For US bureaucrats to have claimed with a straight face that they hoped for a brutal dictator like Hussein to nicely cooperate with their embargo...was so utterly unrealistic as to be tantamount to premeditated mass murder.

It would be as dumb as police negotiators sending food into a house where the bad guy was holding a hostage, and explaining to the bad guy that the food was “…only for the hostage. We’re trying to starve you out, while keeping the hostage fed. If you wouldn’t mind cooperating with our little plan…thanks much.”

Again, it’s not that Western leaders were that stupid. It’s that there was something satanically evil going on here. Decent Americans were fed lies...and unfortunately bought the lies.

As another example, indoctrination had millions of Germans during WW2 turning a blind eye towards the Jewish holocaust, and supporting a 'mad man' as their revered leader.

Military and government personnel can come under...and are under a kind of mind control and indoctrination. The particular agents involved in 9/11 (whether miltary, government, or civilian) could have been fed the psychopathic "neocon" propaganda from PNAC which claimed in so many words that a "new Pearl Harbor" would virtually save the world.

Theorizing here just a little bit--You're told, as a government agent or special ops agent, that what you are doing is of the greatest importance and the epitome of "heroic patriotism"...and so you go forward. How many knew of Pearl Harbor in advance, but had been convinced they were doing America a favor?

But as I said--there is also this extraordinary Luciferian/cultic element which we will be looking at more closely.


We could go on and on. There is an ocean of evidence out there regarding the attacks of 9/11. I am just going to quickly list a few facts before moving on to the next chapter:

Did you know the trucks that hauled the steel material from the WTC wreckage were ‘inexplicably’ outfitted with expensive $2000 GPS devices so that these vehicles could be monitored every inch of the way on their trips to the dumping grounds?

And that ALL of the steel was sold off to distant parts of the globe in very quick succession…despite there supposedly being a huge investigation underway?

(I guess it would’ve been a rather sticky problem if investigators had discovered the steel beams to have thermite residue…a specialized explosive used in demolitions.)

Did you know there have been a number of NYC firefighters who have routinely and vociferously testified of discovering the black boxes from the airplanes…only to hear the government later deny it?

Did you know seven of the nineteen Arab men who were named as "hijackers" came forward in the days following 9/11...identifying themselves as alive and well? These various individuals expressed shock and dismay at having been wrongly acccused and absurdly declared be among the fatalities of 9/11.

The US government has never corrected the error and the same nineteen individuals are still named as "hijackers" to this day. Additionally..."none of the names of the suspected terrorists were ever found to have been included on the official (original) passenger manifests of the hijacked flights. No explanation has ever been given for this oversight." has an article about this matter: Many Questions Remain

Also, did you know that Osama Bin Laden was a widely recognized CIA asset/agent until at least 1996? He seems to have dropped off the radar at that point, but he was known to have made trips to the US and went under the name “Tim Osman”.

Did you know that George Bush Sr. was in a meeting with Bin Laden family members during the morning of the attack?

Did you know that there had been significant business dealings between the Bush family and the Bin Ladens? The Bin Laden family had made sizable investments in Bush family oil ventures in Texas. Bin Laden members spent a lot of time in Texas. In fact, one of the Bin Laden brothers died in an Ultra-light aircraft accident in Texas. LINK

Consider the fact that these ‘terrorists’ were supposed to be fanatically devout religious zealots who were going to commit suicide out of devotion to Allah…yet it has been hugely documented that numerous of these individuals were out ‘bar-hopping, going to strip clubs, getting drunk, and going on gambling cruises. Mohammed Atta as just one example. What’s wrong with this picture? None of this makes sense. None of it adds up.

Here is another huge 9/11 anomaly—In the aftermath of 9/11, government officials swore up and down (Condoleeza Rice, chief among them) that they could never have predicted or expected anything like this attack, when these airplanes went crashing into the World Trade Center towers. But that was a very big and very ominous lie:

The government had civil defense and military exercises planned for that very day and with those exact and specific scenarios! All scheduled for the morning of 9/11, and in the East coast region! Are you having a hard time believing this? It’s heavily documented. Here is an article from Associated Press: LINK

Here is another interesting article.

Here is a brief excerpt:

By JOHN J. LUMPKIN, Associated Press Writer August 23, 2002
In what the government describes as a bizarre coincidence, one U.S. intelligence agency was planning an exercise last Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft would crash into one of its buildings. But the cause wasn't terrorism — it was to be a simulated accident.

This ‘exercise’ scenario went so far as to schedule the arrival of FEMA into New York City the day before the attacks. From“Tom Kenney of FEMA's National Urban Search and Rescue Team, told Dan Rather of CBS News that FEMA had arrived in New York on the night of September 10th.”


Some might wonder why they would bring in FEMA personnel if the intention was to harm Americans: Consider the horrific probability that certain individuals were brought in to put the finishing touches on the planned attack.
The exact same thing happened on the day of the attacks in Britain (on 7/7/05):

Supposedly for the purpose of preplanned "military exercises", military personnel and emergency personnel were "accidently" at the exact location of the subway explosions...before the explosions. Don't believe me?

And how about this one?--


Below is a VERY strange statement from Bush shortly after the attack. He claims to have seen the first airplane hit the first tower. But no one saw that..supposedly. There was only a "miraculous" video tape capture of the moment by two French brothers supposedly doing a documentary on NYC firefighters. (There are, by the way, some indications around the fringes, that this was not simple happenstance.)

Here is the transcript:

QUESTION: One thing, Mr. President, is that you have no idea how much you've done for this country, and another thing is that how did you feel when you heard about the terrorist attack?

BUSH: Well... (APPLAUSE) Thank you, Jordan.

Well, Jordan, you're not going to believe what state I was in when I heard about the terrorist attack. I was in Florida. And my chief of staff, Andy Card -- actually I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works.

And I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on, and I use to fly myself, and I said, "There's one terrible pilot." And I said, "It must have been a horrible accident."

But I was whisked off there -- I didn't have much time to think about it, and I was sitting in the classroom, and Andy Card, my chief who was sitting over here walked in and said, "A second plane has hit the tower. America's under attack."

What is that?? In would appear to be a monumental gaffe on the part of Bush, in inadvertently revealing the fact that he had watched the first impact on, shall we say...CIA closed-circuit TV.

Amazingly, Bush repeated the same exact claim in a seperate question/answer session about a month later! LINK

Here is an informative article that describes all the “coincidences” related to 9/11: LINK

And here is one of my favorite research studies on all the 9/11 anomalies: LINK

And another research article which lists all the conspicuous "omissions" in the 9/11 Commission Report: LINK

In case you missed it earlier, here is this mini-docu (15 minutes) regarding Building Seven:

A couple more:



There are many more of these documentaries. These three are excellent. The first one is a Barry Zwick production. He is a respected researcher and a journalist with 'mainstream' credentials. The third documentary is presented mostly from the standpoint of a handful of activist 9/11 widows. It seeks to show just how many of the puzzle pieces of 9/11 have been inadvertently presented in the mainstream media...and that the 'truth' is thus hiding in plain sight.


Just in case you've somehow missed the implication behind the false flag event of 9/ was meant to create a false scenario: We are to understand that we are now at war--fighting a supposed 'worldwide terrorist threat'. But it has been fabricated, top to bottom. The so-called "War on Terror" is completely made up.

As I stated just a few paragraphs ago (and provided links)....Osama Bin Laden is a phony. He's either dead by now (which the strongest evidence indicates) or he's holed up in five star hotel somewhere. Al Qaida has never even existed in any practical sense of the word. Most of the people being held at Guantanamo are completely innocent. A number of senior CIA agents have become whistle-blowers in declaring the utter fabrication that is..."Al Qaida". LINK

The bottom line: The manufactured War On Terror has given the globalists their "excuse" to build a police state...and to advance step by step militarily upon Israel and Jerusalem, at which time there will occur the long-prophesied "Abomination of Desolation" when the "Antichrist" world leader will stand upon the "holy place" of the Jewish religion, and roar his announcement to the world.

CHAPTER SIX: A Closer Look At The Bush Family.

ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? You can email me at

Or go to my blog The Great Apostasy Plot 

Or go to my "current events" commentary blog:
The New Jerusalem Chronicle



INTRODUCTION: Connecting current events to "end times" a way you've never seen before.

CHAPTER ONE: Hidden Luciferians in American culture, politics, academia...and in the Evangelical community.

CHAPTER TWO: The Kay Arthur/ Al Denson/ Robert Schuller/ Star Trek/ Oprah Winfrey Connection??

CHAPTER THREE: A Closer Look At 9/11.

CHAPTER FOUR: An Even Closer Look At 9/11.

CHAPTER FIVE: 9/11--Some Parting Shots.

CHAPTER SIX: A Closer Look At The Bush Family.

CHAPTER SEVEN: The Franklin Cover-Up / Bohemian Grove Connection.

CHAPTER EIGHT: Entering the Netherworld.

CHAPTER NINE: Hurricanes, earthquakes, famine, pestilence, disease...and more.

CHAPTER TEN: The Pre-Trib Rapture Problem.

CHAPTER ELEVEN: A Grand Tour of the Devil's Crime Syndicate.

CHAPTER TWELVE: Part Two of the Grand Tour.

CHAPTER THIRTEEN: Part Three--Wolves in Sheep's clothing.

CHAPTER FOURTEEN: Part Four--More Wolves.

CHAPTER FIFTEEN: Tracking the Syndicate Through History

CHAPTER SIXTEEN: Tracking the Syndicate--Part Two


CONCLUSION: "Happily Ever After".

No comments: