CHAPTER THREE: A Closer Look At 9/11


I have made the claim here, that one would have difficulty understanding how this phenomenon of hidden Luciferianism fits into the Devil's grand strategy, apart from an accurate assessment of world that factors in the biblical perspective regarding a satanic globalism in the 'end times'. I think (hope) that point will be borne out as you go along here.

I would now take that a step further and say that one cannot understand world politics without taking a very close second look at...the tragedies of 9/11/2001. There are certainly a number of other routes down the "rabbit hole", but this one provides a fast track.

It is amazing to me in hindsight, how there can be thousands upon thousands of credentialed engineers, credentialed architects, not to mention dozens and hundreds and thousands of top "national security experts", top military experts, and innumerable other experts...

...all laughing themselves silly (if it weren't all so horrifically tragic) over the government's official version of the events of 9/11/01.

Go to these links. Read these testimonies for yourself:

Architects/engineers -- LINK

Military and national security experts -- LINK

Prominent members of academia -- LINK 

Take a gander at this tiny 15 minute YouTube video (below) which introduces you to the scientific evidence presented by a dizzying array of top experts exposing the utter falsehood regarding 9/11:

One of the more surprising and disappointing reactions I have gotten to my research, from some folks in the Evangelical community odd dismissiveness and disdain for all things "conspiratorial". I have scratched my head trying to figure out how we have gotten to such a sorry state of affairs among Bible-believing people who should have learned in "Bible 101" about the Devil's schemes (i.e. conspiracies) to gain world domination.

When presented with information that would seem to be indicating just that very scenario, a large percentage of these folks have responded with-- "Look, I just don't buy into conspiracies."

If someone with an alleged "biblical" world view is actually holding to such a notion, then (amazing though it might seem)...that individual therefore, obviously has zero chance of recognizing the conspiracies (i.e. "the schemes") of Satan, in this world. That is very unfortunate. It's tragic.

The entire world is under the shadow of a satanic conspiracy and yet huge numbers of otherwise knowledgeable Bible students are brushing it all off.

What is so ironic here is that about 99% of those same people who politely wave me off in this manner...are at the same time buying heavily into the official "Bin Laden" conspiracy theories in regard to 9/11. If Bin Laden was actually behind 9/11, then obviously he had to have "conspired" extensively!

And so let me just say as an opening salvo to this 9/11 discussion that, as "conspiracy theories" go...the one about a guy named Bin Laden, hanging out in a cave, 10,000 miles away, with a cell phone in his hand, having supposedly pulled off the entirety of 9/11, all while wearing what appears to be a bathrobe and slippers...that conspiracy theory certainly seems to fit into the "far-fetched conspiracy theories" department, in my lowly opinion. Hopefully you'll understand my point as you go further along.

By the way, ironically I also have very little interest in conspiracy "theories" per se. Conspiracy facts...are another thing altogether.


The following information should certainly challenge the notion that only "crackpots" have questioned the official versions of what happened on 9/11:

Unbeknownst to those of us who are exposed only to mainstream media info sources, a wide variety of government leaders (past and present), as well as national security experts, structural engineers (and all manner of engineers, for that matter), architects, demolitionists, and a variety of government whistle-blowers...have all been indicating that the attacks on 9/11/2001 were planned and carried out by criminal elements inside the US government.

Let me just first present a few of the people in government leadership:

Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) was Director of the "Star Wars" program (Advanced Space Programs Development) under Presidents Ford and Carter.

He has a PhD in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering, and was the former Head of the Department of Aeronautical Engineering and Assistant Dean at the U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology. He also had a 22-year Air Force career, with over 100 combat missions.

"I think the very kindest thing that we can say about George W. Bush and all the people in the U.S. Government that have been involved in this massive cover-up, the very kindest thing we can say is that they were aware of impending attacks and let them happen. Now some people will say that’s much too kind, however even that is high treason and conspiracy to commit murder."

"Why did John Ashcroft and top Pentagon officials cancel plans to fly commercial airlines the morning of 9/11? If they knew what was about to happen, why wasn’t it stopped?"

"What was President Bush doing sitting in a classroom for half an hour after he was told that the country was under attack? Why didn’t the Secret Service rush him away from where everyone knew he was, unless they knew he wasn’t a target?"

"A lot of these pieces of information, taken together, prove that the official story, the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 is a bunch of hogwash. It’s impossible. … There’s a second group of facts having to do with the cover up. … Taken together these things prove that high levels of our government don’t want us to know what happened and who’s responsible."

Paul Craig Roberts, PhD – Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Treasury under Ronald Reagan, and the "Father of Reaganomics".

Former Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal. Former Senior Research Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University. Author or co-author of several books on economics and politics, including the best-seller "The Tyranny of Good Intentions".

"We know that it is strictly impossible for any building, much less steel columned buildings, to "pancake" at free fall speed. Therefore, it is a non-controversial fact that the official explanation of the collapse of the WTC buildings is false... The Popular Mechanics article and the TV documentary are obviously false since they both endorse the official explanation that the WTC buildings “pancaked” at free fall speed, an obvious scientific impossibility."

"How could government complicity be kept a secret? It can be kept a secret, because so many Americans are scientifically ignorant and emotionally weak."

"This is the most important book (
"9/11 and American Empire (Vol I) – Intellectuals Speak Out") of our time. Distinguished national and international scientists and scholars present massive evidence that the 9/11 Commission Report is a hoax..."

(Roberts has also been reporting --along with dozens of other notables-- about de facto prison camps being built by FEMA, that can hold far more occupants than there is even the remotest justification for -in the millions. Of course, his warnings are only making it onto the Internet's alternative news sources. A little more about this later.)

Col. Karen U. Kwiatkowski, PhD, U.S. Air Force (ret) – Former Political-Military Affairs Officer in the Office of the Secretary of Defense. Also served on the staff of the Director of the National Security Agency. 20-year Air Force career. Member adjunct faculty, Political Science Department, James Madison University. Instructor, University of Maryland University College. Regular columnist at

"It is as a scientist that I have the most trouble with the official government conspiracy theory, mainly because it does not satisfy the rules of probability or physics. The collapses of the World Trade Center buildings clearly violate the laws of probability and physics..."

"...I saw nothing of significance at the point of impact - no airplane metal or cargo debris was blowing on the lawn in front of the damaged building as smoke billowed from within the Pentagon...the facade had a rather small hole, no larger than 20 feet in diameter."

"Although this facade later collapsed, it remained standing for 30 or 40 minutes, with the roof line remaining relatively straight....The scene, in short, was not what I would have expected from a strike by a large jetliner. It was, however, exactly what one would expect if a missile had struck the Pentagon..."

"We have found solid scientific grounds on which to question the interpretation put upon the events of September 11, 2001 by the Office of the President of the United States of America and subsequently propagated by the major media of western nations."

A photo of the Pentagon taken before the collapse of the facade...never seen by 99% of the public.
Major General Albert Stubblebine, U.S. Army (ret) – Former Commanding General of U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command, 1981 - 1984. Also commanded the U.S. Army’s Electronic Research and Development Command and the U.S. Army’s Intelligence School and Center. Former head of Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence. 32-year Army career.

"One of my experiences in the Army was being in charge of the Army’s Imagery Interpretation for Scientific and Technical Intelligence during the Cold War. I measured pieces of Soviet equipment from photographs. It was my job. I look at the hole in the Pentagon and I look at the size of an airplane that was supposed to have hit the Pentagon. And I said, ‘The plane does not fit in that hole’. So what did hit the Pentagon? What hit it? Where is it? What's going on?"

Barbara Honegger, former presidential advisor to Reagan. She resigned over the infamous
“October Surprise” controversy which you will read about, a short while from now.

Quote: "From the start, the Bush Administration has insisted that anything like the 'planes-as-weapons' scenario of 9-11 was 'unthinkable' before 9-11. That's a huge lie. On Sept. 11, 2001 they had a brand new counter-terror emergency response plan in place at the Pentagon for exactly that scenario, and had a counter-terror 'war-game' set to begin on exactly that scenario that very morning in the nation's capitol."

Catherine Austin Fitts, former Assistant Secretary of Housing under President George Bush Sr.

Why were standard operating procedures for dealing with hijacked airliners not followed that day?

Why were the extensive missile batteries and air defenses reportedly deployed around the Pentagon not activated during the attack?

Why did the Secret Service allow Bush to complete his elementary school visit, apparently unconcerned about his safety or that of the schoolchildren?

Why hasn't a single person been fired, penalized, or reprimanded for the gross incompetence we witnessed that day?

Why haven't authorities in the U.S. and abroad published the results of multiple investigations into trading that strongly suggested foreknowledge of specific details of the 9/11 attacks, resulting in tens of millions of dollars of traceable gains?

"Something is rising from the ashes of September 11: the spectre of questions that will haunt our country until answered." and "A full 66 percent of New York City residents in the survey agreed the case of 9/11 should be reopened by Congress"

(Fitts has also worked to uncover the issue of widespread pedophilia in leadership circles, the drug smuggling on the part of criminal elements inside US government, the 9/11 attack, and a number of other issues which are discussed later.)

Morgan Reynolds, PhD– Chief Economist, U.S. Department of Labor under George W. Bush 2001 - 2002. Former Director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis. Professor Emeritus, Economics, Texas A&M University.

"Fact: Authorities abstained from standard operating procedures to respond to hijackings for a crucial 80 minutes."

"Fact: Collapses of the World Trade Center Towers and WTC 7 building could not have been caused by the two airliner crashes and subsequent jet fuel fires, leaving demolition (controlled explosions) as the best explanation. Further, government officials prevented a forensic examination of the debris, especially the steel, suggesting a cover-up."

"Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapses of WTC 1 (North Tower), WTC 2 (South Tower), and the much-overlooked collapse of the 47-story WTC building 7 at 5:21 pm on that fateful day."

On and on and on it goes. Hundreds of people in leadership positions in American government, with bona fide national security expertise (as you have seen here).

At just this one website I came across, there are over 130 Senior Military, Intelligence Service, Law Enforcement, and Government Officials who summarily reject the "official" version of 9/11 and suspect or believe there has been an "inside job".

See link:


And then...there are all the technical experts: Engineers, architects, demolitionists, air traffic controllers, etc. Take your pick. I just recently ran across this interesting testimonial from an aviation expert:

Robin Hordon is a former FAA Air Traffic Controller at the Boston Air Route Traffic Control Center, located in Nashua, NH (1970 - 1981). He is also former Certified Commercial Pilot, Certified Flight Instructor, and Certified Ground Instructor. Here are his comments:

I knew within hours of the attacks on 9/11/2001 that it was an inside job.

Based on my 11-year experience as an FAA Air Traffic Controller in the busy Northeast corridor, including hundreds of hours of training, briefings, air refuelings, low altitude bombing drills, being part of huge military exercises, daily military training exercises, interacting on a routine basis directly with NORAD radar personnel, and based on my own direct experience dealing with in-flight emergency situations, including two instances of hijacked commercial airliners, I state unequivocally:

There is absolutely no way that four large commercial airliners could have flown around off course for 30 to 60 minutes on 9/11 without being intercepted and shot completely out of the sky by our jet fighters unless very highly placed people in our government and our military wanted it to happen.

It is important for people to understand that scrambling jet fighters to intercept aircraft showing the signs of experiencing "IN-FLIGHT EMERGENCIES" such as going off course without authorization, losing a transponder signal and/or losing radio contact is a common and routine task executed jointly between the FAA and NORAD controllers.

The entire "national defense-first responder" intercept system has many highly-trained civilian and military personnel who are committed and well-trained to this task. FAA and NORAD continuously monitor our skies and fighter planes and pilots are on the ready 24/7 to handle these situations.

Jet fighters typically intercept any suspect plane over the United States within 10 - 15 minutes of notification of a problem. This type of "immediate, high speed, high priority and emergency" scramble had been happening regularly approximately 75 - 150 times per year for ten years.

I believe that 9/11 was what is known as a "False Flag Operation" in which a country inflicts casualties upon itself, and then blames it on an enemy that they want to go to war against. It is one more instance in the United States’ long history of using "False Flag Operations" and blatant propaganda to ramp-up hostile emotions towards an enemy in a population otherwise resistant to going to war.

Architects and Engineers For 9/11 Truth lists thousands of engineers and architects who see absolutely no way for the three World Trade Center buildings to have collapsed as they did...apart from placed explosives.

And interestingly, by contrast, finding credentialed architects or engineers who will happily defend the official, government-approved version of 9/ like finding hen's teeth. LINK

We could go on and on with these testimonials but I am only going to list a handful more, for now. I will link you to these folks, and I will link you to other research websites.

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect – Member, American Institute of Architects. A practicing Architect for 20 years who has worked on most types of building construction including numerous fire-proofed steel-framed buildings:

" research has also concluded that...all three World Trade Center high-rise buildings, the Twin Towers and Building 7 were destroyed not by fire as our government has told us, but by controlled demolition with explosives."

H. Theodore Elden, Jr., B.Arch – Practicing registered architect in West Virginia for over 25 years. Graduate of Carnegie Mellon University. Member, American Institute of Architects, West Virginia Chapter. Appointed Member of West Virginia State Board of Architects. Former Member, National Council of Architectural Registration Boards (NCARB), and Member, National Committee, Intern Development Program for Architects (IDP):

"My web site collects salient information that isolates the demise of the World Trade Towers – linking many experienced, dedicated and articulate technical analysis that show clearly that the World Trade Towers were destroyed by internal explosives and not "fires from the airlines".

Frank A. DeMartini– WTC victim. Architect and WTC Construction Manager, North Tower, 88th floor. Demartini was hired by Leslie E. Robertson Associates to rebuild the World Trade Center after the 1993 attack:

"The [Twin Tower] building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door. This intense grid ­ and the jet-plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting."

Hugo Bachmann, PhD – Professor Emeritus and former Chairman of the Department of Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. Author and co-author of Seismic Analysis of Concrete Reinforced Structures (1990), Vibration Problems in Structures: Practical Guidelines (1995), Structural Analysis of Linked Concrete Beams (1998), Structural Construction for Engineers. An introduction (2001), Earthquake-proofing Buildings (2002):

"In my opinion the building WTC 7 was, with great probability, professionally demolished"

David Leifer, BSc, B.Arch, M.Ed, PhD, IEng, ACIBSE – Coordinator, Graduate Programme in Facilities Management, University of Sydney. Formerly taught at University of Auckland (1993 - 2001), University of Queensland (1986 - 1993), Mackintosh School of Architecture (1984 - 1986). Registered Architect. Incorporated Engineer:
"The fall of the World Trade Center video showed the side of one tower ‘unzipping’ along one side of a damaged floor. My knowledge of structure and dynamics told me that unless the other sides simultaneously ‘unzipped’ there was no way that the tower would have ‘pancaked’ onto it’s own footprint: it should surely have toppled outwards. That both towers did the same was just too improbable to be plausible."

"...there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore that the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that may have been the actual cause behind the destruction of the World Trade Center Towers and WTC Building 7."

David A. Johnson, B.Arch, MCP (City Planning), PhD (Regional Planning), F.AICP – Internationally recognized architect and city and regional planner. Professor Emeritus, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Tennessee. Recipient of five Fulbright Scholarships:
"I was dubious of the official explanations from the outset. You see, as a professional city planner in New York, I knew those buildings and their design...When I saw the rapid collapse of the towers, I knew that they could not come down the way they did without explosives and the severing of core columns at the base."

"The spewing of debris from the towers where the planes entered also could not have occurred simply with just a structural collapse. Something else was happening to make this occur. Moreover, the symmetrical collapse is strong evidence of a controlled demolition. A building falling from asymmetrical structural failure would not collapse so neatly, nor so rapidly..."

At thousands of experts of all kinds provide many more of these testimonials.


In just a moment, I will try to present an overview of the actual physical evidence from 9/11 such as these revisionist experts have laid it out. And I'll say this: Many of the arguments which unravel the official story about what happened on that day...are so simple, my little daughter (still in elementary school) has been able to grasp it.

But first, a bit of historical context:

To think that government doesn't engage in 'false flag' provocateuring is extremely unrealistic. Many folks (myself included) have come to conclusions about Pearl Harbor, for example, having been deliberately allowed to happen. There has been much documented research which confirms this to be the case, no matter how doggedly the mainstream media and academia cling to the ‘official’ version.

By the time December 7, 1941 rolled around, U.S. intelligence had long since broken the Japanese communication codes and could routinely read all their communiqu├ęs. Top U.S. leaders were completely aware of the oncoming attack.

And when one thinks about it--just what was the objective of the Japanese in attacking Pearl Harbor? There certainly are no legitimate U.S. historians who would claim Japan was actually trying to “conquer” America. This should leave any thoughtful American wondering therefore, what actual purpose was served in the bloody war between Japan and the US...and what the real story might have been behind Pearl Harbor.

Amazingly, there are a number of diehard Americanists out there who irrationally 'justify' any foreknowledge the US government might have had of the attack...but the bottom line is that anyone in American leadership who would have deliberately allowed 3000 American soldier boys to go to their deaths at Pearl Harbor, obviously had a philosophy and values…which were extracted from the pit of hell.

And (below) this is a little awkward—don’t you think?: A dead-on prediction regarding a Japanese strike against Hawaii a week before the event. Ask yourself why you’ve never seen ‘hide nor hair’ of this newspaper headline or article. We’re just now, almost seventy years after the fact, finding out that the intelligence sources of a $45/ weekly local reporter outstripped the entire United States government?

I don’t think that is plausible in the least. This a good example of how mainstream media and mainstream historians routinely bury inconvenient facts. Not much in the history books about this successful prediction, is there?

HERE for larger image.

From US Government Knew of Coming Japanese Attack 

Additional link: World leaders admit to false flag terror

And who, at this point, doesn't yet know about the Gulf of Tonkin incident being manufactured and used by LBJ to fake us into the Vietnam war?

Even a gung-ho pro-military, pro-war website like that of the United States Naval Institute, in an article entitled
“The Secret Side of the Tonkin Gulf Incident” makes this concession:

“Today, it is believed that this…attack did not occur and was merely reports from jittery radar and sonar operators, but at the time it was taken [i.e. used] as evidence that Hanoi was raising the stakes against the United States.”

Have we not figured out at this point, that war is a huge money-maker for certain entities? At long last, every conscientious American should ask themselves the question (as I finally did at one point)-- What purpose did the Vietnam war actually serve in the end? And who benefited (profited) from this fiasco…and shouldn’t we be taking a closer look at them?

Then there is Operation Northwoods. No, you're not going to hear much about THAT on 60 Minutes. But it documents extensive plans on the part of criminal elements in U.S. government to engage in 'false flag' operations i.e. terrorist attacks against Americans, to provoke a desired war with Cuba.

Some might argue that since the principal planners of these treasonous actions were ‘legitimate’ and established members of the government itself, the U.S. Secretary of Defense, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and so on…how can we therefore refer to such as “criminal elements”?---

The Northwoods documents make it clear that these people sat there proposing and carefully planning horror after horror. Such things as having U.S. fighter jets shoot down American civilian airliners (or appearing to do so), the sinking of U.S. naval ships, the mass murder of Cuban refugees en route to America by boat, sniper attacks which would kill any number of American citizens. On and on this report goes.

The planning and conspiring of such things, in and of itself, WAS criminal conduct…and we as American citizens need, at long last, to understand that “tyranny” can come from the INSIDE as well as the outside.

It was only John F. Kennedy (liberal or not) who finally nixed the Northwoods plan, which along with his refusal to expand the Vietnam war…very quickly made him extremely unpopular with many powerful people in the Military/Industrial complex.

And by the way, why HAVE the American people been told next to nothing about Operation Northwoods? Why do we know all about Watergate and Monica Lewinsky...but nothing about this incredibly treasonous behavior?

It certainly should be ‘food for thought’ for those reading this, who are struggling to accept the idea of massive cover-ups and lying on the part of government leaders and the ‘lap dog’ mainstream media.

It is interesting that the oaths of our very U.S. military personnel include the statement “to defend…against all enemies, both foreign and domestic…”. Those oaths stem directly from the numerous and pointed warnings of the Founding Fathers regarding the very real dangers of tyranny-from-within.

With the Freedom of Information Act release of the Northwoods documents, U.S. government ‘false flag’ operations are a known and official reality. See samples of “Operation Northwoods” documents below.

HERE and HERE for larger images.


If you're having trouble believing this kind of psychosis exists at top levels of governmental leadership, consider the following quote from September of 2000.

The neo-conservative think-tank Project for a New American Century (members include Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Jeb Bush, and Paul Wolfowitz) published a report entitled "Rebuilding America's Defenses." Here is one of the statements in that report:

“… the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor.”

Take a close look at the "subliminal" message here. They are literally saying that the world would be a better place but for the absence of a new Pearl Harbor. According to them, a "new Pearl Harbor" would literally benefit the world. I’m imagining how these people might paraphrase this-- "Well, we don't really relish another Pearl Harbor but you know...sometimes the world can benefit from mass murder."

Excuse me?

Let's be "discerning" here--any wistful expressions about mass death are a reflection of madness and psychopathy . Many historians believe this same kind of insanity came into play with those who knew in advance that Pearl Harbor was going to be attacked but thought the world would ultimately be a 'better place' because of it.

Herein lies the dangerous subtlety of indoctrination and propaganda. We routinely underestimate their powers. We associate "propaganda" with the clunky, corny stuff we have seen in TV documentaries about the Nazi propaganda that was used on the German people. "Who would fall for that stuff?"--we think to ourselves.

Wait a minute-- As just one example, look at the Bill Clinton /Madeleine Albright Oil-For-Food holocaust perpetrated against Iraqi children during most of the 90's-- It was precisely "indoctrination" and "propaganda" that deceived millions of otherwise decent, charitable, neighborly Americans into heartily approving the agonizing deaths of 500,000 Iraqi children.


And if you're still having trouble believing there are people in American leadership who would approve or welcome a "new Pearl Harbor"...consider this interesting recent quote from David Rockefeller (one of the 'ruling elite' / "smoke-filled-room" boys in America today), in his book "Memoirs" published after 9/11, by the way. (Random House, 2002):

"Some...believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as "internationalists" and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—-one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

Are you kidding me? He and his associates are proud to be working "against the best interests of the United States"?? It is time for Americans to wake up to the reality that many of our leaders (as Rockefeller openly admits!) are indeed working against America, not for it.

NEXT UP-- CHAPTER FOUR: "Part Two" of a 9/11 re-examination.

ANY COMMENTS OR QUESTIONS? You can email me at

Or go to my blog The Great Apostasy Plot 

Or go to my "current events" commentary blog:
The New Jerusalem Chronicle



INTRODUCTION: Connecting current events to "end times" a way you've never seen before.

CHAPTER ONE: Hidden Luciferians in American culture, politics, academia...and in the Evangelical community.

CHAPTER TWO: The Kay Arthur/ Al Denson/ Robert Schuller/ Star Trek/ Oprah Winfrey Connection??

CHAPTER THREE: A Closer Look At 9/11.

CHAPTER FOUR: An Even Closer Look At 9/11.

CHAPTER FIVE: 9/11--Some Parting Shots.

CHAPTER SIX: A Closer Look At The Bush Family.

CHAPTER SEVEN: The Franklin Cover-Up / Bohemian Grove Connection.

CHAPTER EIGHT: Entering the Netherworld.

CHAPTER NINE: Hurricanes, earthquakes, famine, pestilence, disease...and more.

CHAPTER TEN: The Pre-Trib Rapture Problem.

CHAPTER ELEVEN: A Grand Tour of the Devil's Crime Syndicate.

CHAPTER TWELVE: Part Two of the Grand Tour.

CHAPTER THIRTEEN: Part Three--Wolves in Sheep's clothing.

CHAPTER FOURTEEN: Part Four--More Wolves.

CHAPTER FIFTEEN: Tracking the Syndicate Through History

CHAPTER SIXTEEN: Tracking the Syndicate--Part Two


CONCLUSION: "Happily Ever After".